Jammu: In a deft tactical move to woo Muslim voters, BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi on Sunday downplayed the party’s avowed stand on Article 370 giving special status to Jammu & Kashmir, saying it should be debated whether the constitutional provision has been beneficial for the state and even hinted that it may give up its demand for abrogation if such a view emerges. Addressing his first rally after being named the BJP's prime ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi said his party wanted a discussion on various aspects of the issue. He echoed views expressed by BJP president Rajnath Singh, who earlier even told the 'Lalkar' rally that if Article 370 proved to be beneficial, his party would stand by the measure.
It is a departure from BJP's position seeking complete abrogation of the Article giving special status to J&K in the Union of India. Referring to the provision, Modi said that women had not been given equal rights in the state unlike in other parts of the country. "If Omar (Abdullah) married outside Kashmir, his rights of being a citizen remain whereas his sister Sara loses the right for the same. Is this not discrimination against the women in the state," he asked, while referring to the chief minister's family. Taking on the Centre for its China policy, the Gujarat chief minister claimed that China had been distributing free SIM cards to villagers along the border with India. "I want to ask whether our telecom ministry can't provide the same," he said.
Modi also spoke about "non-implementation" of the 73rd Amendment providing financial powers to panchayats and took a veiled dig at the ruling National Conference, saying, "Those who talk about autonomy are not ready to provide the same to their own elected local bodies." He accused the state government of indulging in corruption and said the Prevention of Corruption Act is applicable everywhere other than Jammu & Kashmir. "For 60 years they talked about separate state (autonomy) but what did people get? Nothing and there is no accountability also...In the name of separate state, they encouraged separatism. "It would have been better if they focused on creating a super state," he said.
